![]() |
|
|
October 2008 |
|
|
| HIGH COURT |
|
Breach of Business Agreement Justified Cancellation: A High Court Judge held various breaches when the vendor had set up in competition with the purchaser (using another person as a “front man”) (including breach of the restraint of trade commitment and no adverse knowledge warranty) justified the purchaser cancelling the business sale. Council Liable for Incorrect LIM: A local Council issued a LIM that incorrectly stated a business property had certain water rights. The Council was held liable for a breach of statutory duty. Interestingly, in this particular instance, the liability was “passed onto” the real estate agent and solicitors for their negligence in the relevant transaction. Pre-emptive Right: The Court upheld a pre-emptive right. The Court held that the pre-emptive right (the entitlement to purchase triggered if the asset was "available for sale" was established by plain fact that the asset had been sold). |
| OVERSEAS CASES OF INTEREST |
|
Australian: Break Fee Payable: The Australian court had to decide whether a competing proposal had been announced “prior to the date of the Symbion Health general meeting”. Payment of a $19.575m break fee turned on whether “the date of the general meeting” meant the date scheduled for the meeting or the date on which the meeting was actually held. The Judge held the words describe the date of the actual meeting. As a consequence no break fee was payable as no meeting was actually held. Australian: Access to Tax Losses on Share Purchase: The Australian Federal Court strictly applied the “same business test” that must be met for an acquirer to continue to access tax losses in the company which they acquired all the shares of. USA: MAE Clauses: In Hexion Specialty Chemicals v Huntsman Corp (Sept 08) the Delaware Court of Chancery adopted the legal standard applied in the prior US Tyson Foods case and held the material adverse effect (MAE) clause had not been triggered in the relevant circumstances and also that a clause that would ‘cap” liability for breach of the contract was not applicable as there had been a “knowing and intentional” breach. The Court ordered the purchaser to specifically perform its obligations under the merger agreement. USA: Investment Bank Limited Fiduciary Duty: Another US Court recently dismissed a claim that an investment bank retained by the target’s board of directors owed any fiduciary duties to the target’s shareholders (Joyce v Morgan Stanley & Co.). |
| FRANCHISE REGULATION CONSULTATION |
| The Government released a consultation paper seeking input on whether franchising in New Zealand needs its own regulatory framework or whether the current voluntary regime offers sufficient protections. |
| COMPETITION / ANTI-TRUST IN NZ M&A |
|
The Commerce Commission cleared acquisitions in respect of the supply of aviation fuels and the supply of roofing tiles. An application in respect of private health sector (hospitals). |
| AWARDS & LISTINGS |
| Quigg Partners are pleased again to be listed in Chambers Global 2008 (Leaders in their Field), and Who's Who Legal of M&A Lawyers 2008. |
| RECENT TRANSACTIONS FOR QUIGG PARTNERS |
Quigg Partners has recently had the
pleasure of advising:
|
| FURTHER INFORMATION |
| M & A Corporate | ||
| David Quigg John Horner Matt Yates Melissa Pengelly Asha Stewart Bela Mistry |
+64 4 474 0755 +64 4 474 0754 +64 4 474 0768 +64 4 474 0757 +64 4 474 0751 +64 4 474 0769 |
davidquigg@quiggpartners.com johnhorner@quiggpartners.com mattyates@quiggpartners.com melissapengelly@quiggpartners.com ashastewart@quiggpartners.com belamistry@quiggpartners.com |
| Employment | ||
| Michael Quigg Jol Bates Tim Sissons Simon Martin |
+64 4 474 0766 +64 4 474 0759 +64 4 474 0758 +64 4 474 0752 |
|
|
Delete from Circulation List If you receive our regular newsletters but would like to be deleted from our circulation list please advise by emailing theresacains@quiggpartners.com. |
|
|